Talk:List of poets (600-1600): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] |
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] |
||
Both wrote primarily poetry as far as I know, so I'll add them in. As to when a poet becomes a poet, for the sake of this list as long as they've written a number of pieces of notable poetry. I'd have trouble justifying Queen Elizabeth as a poet (although she wrote a few poems). Shakespeare on the other hand qualifies because although he is best known for his plays his sonnets are a significant portion of his work. |
|||
[[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 00:08, 1 Jun 2004 (EST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:08, 1 June 2004
Which of the 12thC authors I know of (in english translations without meter) actually get called poets - Chretien_De_Troyes, Marie_de_France, (are lais told in poetry?, must read some soon), Wace (the last translation i tried to read was so bad, that I hope the original was poetry). When does someone stop being a poet and become just an author. hmm
Both wrote primarily poetry as far as I know, so I'll add them in. As to when a poet becomes a poet, for the sake of this list as long as they've written a number of pieces of notable poetry. I'd have trouble justifying Queen Elizabeth as a poet (although she wrote a few poems). Shakespeare on the other hand qualifies because although he is best known for his plays his sonnets are a significant portion of his work.
Conrad Leviston 00:08, 1 Jun 2004 (EST)
