Talk:William the Conqueror: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Anton de Stoc |
Anton de Stoc |
||
Politokopolis |
Politokopolis |
||
Good point. My immediate response would be that both of the exmples you cited were part of a civil war (or popular uprising). Upon consideration the same could be said for William the concreter. It's a bit of an argument about nomenclature here I suspect. I've changed the wording slightly but you may still disagree with it. Feel free to change it if that's the case. |
|||
Oh, and register as a wiki user too. It's good to have you aboard Anton. Anyone with your enormous background knowledge is highly valued. |
|||
Revision as of 23:57, 27 October 2003
It's actually not true that William the Conqueror was the most recent invasion of England.
Henry Tudor invaded from France in 1485, and James II was essentially deposed when 14 000 of William of Orange's troops landed to kick off the "Glorious Revolution" of 1688.
I also think some armies landed during Stephen and Matilda's civil war, but those two will do for a start :)
Anton de Stoc Politokopolis
Good point. My immediate response would be that both of the exmples you cited were part of a civil war (or popular uprising). Upon consideration the same could be said for William the concreter. It's a bit of an argument about nomenclature here I suspect. I've changed the wording slightly but you may still disagree with it. Feel free to change it if that's the case.
Oh, and register as a wiki user too. It's good to have you aboard Anton. Anyone with your enormous background knowledge is highly valued.
