User talk:User 144 - Revision history

Paul Matisz: Thanks

2007-05-05T23:03:47Z

Thanks

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 6 May 2007
Line 40:		Line 40:
	== Fencing ==		== Fencing ==
	Hi, You seem to have moved the [[fencing]] page effectively back to the [http://cunnan.sca.org.au/index.php?title=Fencing&oldid=29886 text that existed on Oct 25]. I can't understand why? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 09:49, 27 October 2006 (EST)		Hi, You seem to have moved the [[fencing]] page effectively back to the [http://cunnan.sca.org.au/index.php?title=Fencing&oldid=29886 text that existed on Oct 25]. I can't understand why? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 09:49, 27 October 2006 (EST)

			== Thanks ==

			Sorry about being gone for so long... you know the old saying "life happens"? Well, a ''whole lot'' of life happened to me over the last six months or so.

			The [[shield\|shield article]] is about as done as it's going to get, at least from my point of view -- obviously refinements can be ongoing. I've been considering working a paragraph about how various shields "handle", but that strikes me as a bit too subjective for the subject matter.

			[[User:Paul Matisz]] -- 2007-05-05 19:03 EST

Cian: fencing

2006-10-26T23:49:52Z

fencing

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 27 October 2006
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* Wow... are you ever going to run out of pages to categorise :^) I guess you're not a librarian because you haven't given pages any dewey codes! Way to go.		* Wow... are you ever going to run out of pages to categorise :^) I guess you're not a librarian because you haven't given pages any dewey codes! Way to go.
	:One question. Are you planning to have pages in the super- and subcategories, e.g. [[:special:category\|places]] and [[:special:category\|countries (modern)]], or just the subcategory?? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 23:01, 28 May 2006 (EST)		:One question. Are you planning to have pages in the super- and subcategories, e.g. [[:special:category\|places]] and [[:special:category\|countries (modern)]], or just the subcategory?? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 23:01, 28 May 2006 (EST)

			== Fencing ==
			Hi, You seem to have moved the [[fencing]] page effectively back to the [http://cunnan.sca.org.au/index.php?title=Fencing&oldid=29886 text that existed on Oct 25]. I can't understand why? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 09:49, 27 October 2006 (EST)

Cian: dewey 021

2006-05-28T13:01:13Z

dewey 021

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 28 May 2006
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Huh. I'm showing more than 50 categorizing links as of 18:12 EST. Good work! Busy day? [[User:Paul Matisz]] 29 April 2006 - 18:13 EST		Huh. I'm showing more than 50 categorizing links as of 18:12 EST. Good work! Busy day? [[User:Paul Matisz]] 29 April 2006 - 18:13 EST
			* Wow... are you ever going to run out of pages to categorise :^) I guess you're not a librarian because you haven't given pages any dewey codes! Way to go.
			:One question. Are you planning to have pages in the super- and subcategories, e.g. [[:special:category\|places]] and [[:special:category\|countries (modern)]], or just the subcategory?? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 23:01, 28 May 2006 (EST)

Paul Matisz: Categorizing

2006-04-29T22:13:20Z

Categorizing

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:13, 30 April 2006
Line 31:		Line 31:

	It's not that I mind, so much, it's just that the vandalism is really juvenile. Makes you wish for a higher form of vandal.		It's not that I mind, so much, it's just that the vandalism is really juvenile. Makes you wish for a higher form of vandal.

			== Categorizing ==

			Huh. I'm showing more than 50 categorizing links as of 18:12 EST. Good work! Busy day? [[User:Paul Matisz]] 29 April 2006 - 18:13 EST

Paul Matisz: Spoke too soon!

2006-04-25T16:29:08Z

Spoke too soon!

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:29, 26 April 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:
	I've added the shield construction posting to the [[shield]] article -- you said you were interested.		I've added the shield construction posting to the [[shield]] article -- you said you were interested.
	--[[User:Paul Matisz]]		--[[User:Paul Matisz]]

			== Spoke too soon! ==

			[[Religion in the Renaissance]] has been repeatedly vandalized again, looks like by the same people. I've corrected it.
			Guilty parties: [[User:64.56.136.110]], [[User:66.4.125.11]] and [[User:208.182.75.11]].

			It's not that I mind, so much, it's just that the vandalism is really juvenile. Makes you wish for a higher form of vandal.

Paul Matisz: shield construction post

2006-03-26T14:51:38Z

shield construction post

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 27 March 2006
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I've added the shield construction posting to the [[shield]] article -- you said you were interested.		I've added the shield construction posting to the [[shield]] article -- you said you were interested.
	--[[[Paul Matisz]]		--[[[Paul Matisz]]

			== shield construction post ==

			I've added the shield construction posting to the [[shield]] article -- you said you were interested.
			--[[User:Paul Matisz]]

Paul Matisz: shield construction post

2006-03-26T14:51:07Z

shield construction post

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 27 March 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Thanks for all your help on Cunnan, and hopefully your new admin status will make things a little easier for you. [[User:Conrad Leviston\|Conrad Leviston]] 18:50, 23 Mar 2006 (CST)		Thanks for all your help on Cunnan, and hopefully your new admin status will make things a little easier for you. [[User:Conrad Leviston\|Conrad Leviston]] 18:50, 23 Mar 2006 (CST)

			== shield construction post ==

			I've added the shield construction posting to the [[shield]] article -- you said you were interested.
			--[[[Paul Matisz]]

Conrad Leviston: You are now an admin

2006-03-24T00:50:25Z

You are now an admin

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 24 March 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	----		----
	I notice that you have been helping undo the work of spammers and vandals on [[Cunnan]]. This is great but I suspect it is much easier for us Administrators to fix the large edits than you. All we have to do is press a rollback button to undo the rubbish. And we can ban the user for an while (as you can see Tobin has recently). By all means keep cleaning up the rubbish edits, but if at any time you are afraid you might miss something in your fix, fear not! We have the power! {cough cough splutter splutter} Given time, you too may become an Admin. ---- Cian		I notice that you have been helping undo the work of spammers and vandals on [[Cunnan]]. This is great but I suspect it is much easier for us Administrators to fix the large edits than you. All we have to do is press a rollback button to undo the rubbish. And we can ban the user for an while (as you can see Tobin has recently). By all means keep cleaning up the rubbish edits, but if at any time you are afraid you might miss something in your fix, fear not! We have the power! {cough cough splutter splutter} Given time, you too may become an Admin. ---- Cian

			== You are now an admin ==

			A couple of months of fairly heavy editing and a bit of cleaning up after vandals has earned you the status of admin. Congratulations.

			In practical terms this means that you can block vandals, protect pages, edit protected pages (which at the moment is only the front page) and a couple of other minor things.

			Thanks for all your help on Cunnan, and hopefully your new admin status will make things a little easier for you. [[User:Conrad Leviston\|Conrad Leviston]] 18:50, 23 Mar 2006 (CST)

Cian: fixing vandalism and packaged meat products

2006-03-01T00:18:07Z

fixing vandalism and packaged meat products

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:18, 1 March 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	----		----
	Why did you remove the link to [[buttercup]] (which doesn't yet exist) on [[buttercup (Askham)]]? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:19, 2 Feb 2006 (CST)		Why did you remove the link to [[buttercup]] (which doesn't yet exist) on [[buttercup (Askham)]]? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:19, 2 Feb 2006 (CST)
			----
			I notice that you have been helping undo the work of spammers and vandals on [[Cunnan]]. This is great but I suspect it is much easier for us Administrators to fix the large edits than you. All we have to do is press a rollback button to undo the rubbish. And we can ban the user for an while (as you can see Tobin has recently). By all means keep cleaning up the rubbish edits, but if at any time you are afraid you might miss something in your fix, fear not! We have the power! {cough cough splutter splutter} Given time, you too may become an Admin. ---- Cian

Cian: Buttercup, buttercup, baker's man

2006-02-03T01:19:55Z

Buttercup, buttercup, baker's man

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 3 February 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* To the contrary, you have been filling in many blank spaces with good snippets of information. Thank you very much for your efforts.<br>Please excuse me if I sometimes seem to jump in right away and "correct" your formatting/links etc (e.g. stopping a page linking to itself, editing links to plural nouns). I am merely being a wiki-Nutzi and trying to keep things consistant across Cunnan, something which goes against the whole idea of wikis being "free-flowing" and open-to-change, of course. <Shrugs> Where would the world be without perfectionists! - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:59, 23 Jan 2006 (CST)		* To the contrary, you have been filling in many blank spaces with good snippets of information. Thank you very much for your efforts.<br>Please excuse me if I sometimes seem to jump in right away and "correct" your formatting/links etc (e.g. stopping a page linking to itself, editing links to plural nouns). I am merely being a wiki-Nutzi and trying to keep things consistant across Cunnan, something which goes against the whole idea of wikis being "free-flowing" and open-to-change, of course. <Shrugs> Where would the world be without perfectionists! - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:59, 23 Jan 2006 (CST)
	* Hi again. Just noted one thing you might want to know. You have been really helpful fixing links to plural nouns, but you have been doing it the hard way! You don't need to type ''[['''''knight\| knights''''']]''. Just shift the plural 's' outside the brackets like ''[['''''knight''''']]'''''s'''. Of course, some like ''[['''''city\|cities''''']]'' do require the whole link being included. And if a page like [[Norsemen]] keeps getting referred to, but you want it to always point to another page, e.g. [[viking]], you can always set up the first page as a redirect that just contains '''#redirect ''[['' ''viking]]'' '''- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 18:20, 24 Jan 2006 (CST)		* Hi again. Just noted one thing you might want to know. You have been really helpful fixing links to plural nouns, but you have been doing it the hard way! You don't need to type ''[['''''knight\| knights''''']]''. Just shift the plural 's' outside the brackets like ''[['''''knight''''']]'''''s'''. Of course, some like ''[['''''city\|cities''''']]'' do require the whole link being included. And if a page like [[Norsemen]] keeps getting referred to, but you want it to always point to another page, e.g. [[viking]], you can always set up the first page as a redirect that just contains '''#redirect ''[['' ''viking]]'' '''- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 18:20, 24 Jan 2006 (CST)
			----
			Why did you remove the link to [[buttercup]] (which doesn't yet exist) on [[buttercup (Askham)]]? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:19, 2 Feb 2006 (CST)