User talk:AlexandreDavigne - Revision history

Yvesdelyle: fixing links to the help pages

2014-06-13T11:22:47Z

fixing links to the help pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 13 June 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Welcome ==		== Welcome ==

	Hi! Welcome to the show. You've been adding a lot of content lately. Check the [[~~Cunnan~~:~~How_to_edit_a_page~~]] link to get some cool tips on how to make links, categorize articles, and otherwise make your entries as snazzy as possible. [[User:Paul Matisz]] 12:00EST, 07 Sept 2006.		Hi! Welcome to the show. You've been adding a lot of content lately. Check the [[Help:Editing\|How to edit a page]] link to get some cool tips on how to make links, categorize articles, and otherwise make your entries as snazzy as possible. [[User:Paul Matisz]] 12:00EST, 07 Sept 2006.

	== Ostgardr ==		== Ostgardr ==

Cian at 23:14, 12 March 2013

2013-03-12T23:14:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 13 March 2013
Line 50:		Line 50:
	I notice you have opened discussions about various [[heraldic]] [[rank]]s. These ranks are/were used within [[Lochac]] too and seem to be used in some way in [[Ealdormere]], [[West Kingdom]] et al. How are heralds ranked within the heraldic college of your [[kingdom]]?		I notice you have opened discussions about various [[heraldic]] [[rank]]s. These ranks are/were used within [[Lochac]] too and seem to be used in some way in [[Ealdormere]], [[West Kingdom]] et al. How are heralds ranked within the heraldic college of your [[kingdom]]?
	- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:01, 15 January 2011 (EST)		- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:01, 15 January 2011 (EST)
	= Your promotion =		== Your promotion ==
	Hi Alexandre,		Hi Alexandre,
	Since no-one objected, I have promoted you to Administrator rank. This is effectively the moderator level so now you can do all the sweet tricks outlined on http://cunnan.sca.org.au/wiki/Special:ListGroupRights . This includes deleting bpages and blocking nasty spammers. Of course, this is purely voluntary. You don't have to do any of these things, but you now have the power to. If you have any questions, just ask.		Since no-one objected, I have promoted you to Administrator rank. This is effectively the moderator level so now you can do all the sweet tricks outlined on http://cunnan.sca.org.au/wiki/Special:ListGroupRights . This includes deleting bpages and blocking nasty spammers. Of course, this is purely voluntary. You don't have to do any of these things, but you now have the power to. If you have any questions, just ask.

Cian at 23:14, 12 March 2013

2013-03-12T23:14:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 13 March 2013
Line 50:		Line 50:
	I notice you have opened discussions about various [[heraldic]] [[rank]]s. These ranks are/were used within [[Lochac]] too and seem to be used in some way in [[Ealdormere]], [[West Kingdom]] et al. How are heralds ranked within the heraldic college of your [[kingdom]]?		I notice you have opened discussions about various [[heraldic]] [[rank]]s. These ranks are/were used within [[Lochac]] too and seem to be used in some way in [[Ealdormere]], [[West Kingdom]] et al. How are heralds ranked within the heraldic college of your [[kingdom]]?
	- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:01, 15 January 2011 (EST)		- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:01, 15 January 2011 (EST)
			= Your promotion =
			Hi Alexandre,
			Since no-one objected, I have promoted you to Administrator rank. This is effectively the moderator level so now you can do all the sweet tricks outlined on http://cunnan.sca.org.au/wiki/Special:ListGroupRights . This includes deleting bpages and blocking nasty spammers. Of course, this is purely voluntary. You don't have to do any of these things, but you now have the power to. If you have any questions, just ask.
			Welcome.
			- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] ([[User talk:Cian\|talk]]) 09:14, 13 March 2013 (EST)

Cian: /* Heraldic ranks */

2011-01-15T09:04:17Z

Heraldic ranks

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 15 January 2011
Line 48:		Line 48:

	==Heraldic ranks ==		==Heraldic ranks ==
	I notice you have opened discussions about various [[heraldic]] [[rank]]s. These ranks are/were used within [[Lochac]] too and seem to be used in some way in [[Ealdormere]] et al. How are heralds ranked within the heraldic college of your [[kingdom]]?		I notice you have opened discussions about various [[heraldic]] [[rank]]s. These ranks are/were used within [[Lochac]] too and seem to be used in some way in [[Ealdormere]], [[West Kingdom]] et al. How are heralds ranked within the heraldic college of your [[kingdom]]?
	- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:01, 15 January 2011 (EST)		- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:01, 15 January 2011 (EST)

Cian at 09:01, 15 January 2011

2011-01-15T09:01:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 15 January 2011
Line 46:		Line 46:
	Baronial awards granting status as an armiger is not governed by the Corpora but by the laws and traditions of an individual Kingdom; so the statement in the article Baronial Level Awards that BLAs are never Armigerous is both false and misleading.		Baronial awards granting status as an armiger is not governed by the Corpora but by the laws and traditions of an individual Kingdom; so the statement in the article Baronial Level Awards that BLAs are never Armigerous is both false and misleading.
	--[[User:Saitotakauji\|Saitotakauji]] 02:24, 19 July 2009 (EST)		--[[User:Saitotakauji\|Saitotakauji]] 02:24, 19 July 2009 (EST)

			==Heraldic ranks ==
			I notice you have opened discussions about various [[heraldic]] [[rank]]s. These ranks are/were used within [[Lochac]] too and seem to be used in some way in [[Ealdormere]] et al. How are heralds ranked within the heraldic college of your [[kingdom]]?
			- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:01, 15 January 2011 (EST)

Saitotakauji: /* Armigerous Baronial Awards */

2009-07-18T16:24:45Z

Armigerous Baronial Awards

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 19 July 2009
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Per the charters of the Aspen of Caerthe, the Golden Ring of Unser Hafen, the Hammer of Al-Barran and the Dragon's Claw of Dragonsspine:		Per the charters of the Aspen of Caerthe, the Golden Ring of Unser Hafen, the Hammer of Al-Barran and the Dragon's Claw of Dragonsspine:

	A. The award shall carry with it, subject to the pleasure of the Crown, an Award of Arms. Companions of the order shall take precedence after principality orders but before a simple Award of Arms.		A. The award shall carry with it, subject to the pleasure of the Crown, an Award of Arms. Companions of the order shall take precedence after principality orders but before a simple Award of Arms.

⚫	B. If the award is given to a person who ~~bears~~ an ~~award~~ ~~carrying~~ ~~higher~~ precedence ~~than~~ ~~given~~ ~~above,~~ his/her ~~precedence~~ ~~shall~~ ~~remain~~ ~~unchanged~~.
	C. If the award is given to a person who ~~has previously received~~ an ~~Award~~ of ~~Arms, his/her~~ precedence ~~shall~~ ~~date~~ ~~from~~ his/her ~~election~~ to ~~the~~ ~~Order~~.		B. If the award is given to a person who bears an award carrying higher precedence than given above, his/her precedence shall remain unchanged.

		⚫	C. If the award is given to a person who has previously received an Award of Arms, his/her precedence shall date from his/her election to the Order.

	Retrieved from wimble.outlandsheralds.org Office of the Wimble Herald of the Outlands College of Heralds		Retrieved from wimble.outlandsheralds.org Office of the Wimble Herald of the Outlands College of Heralds
Line 43:		Line 45:

	Baronial awards granting status as an armiger is not governed by the Corpora but by the laws and traditions of an individual Kingdom; so the statement in the article Baronial Level Awards that BLAs are never Armigerous is both false and misleading.		Baronial awards granting status as an armiger is not governed by the Corpora but by the laws and traditions of an individual Kingdom; so the statement in the article Baronial Level Awards that BLAs are never Armigerous is both false and misleading.
			--[[User:Saitotakauji\|Saitotakauji]] 02:24, 19 July 2009 (EST)

Saitotakauji at 16:21, 18 July 2009

2009-07-18T16:21:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 19 July 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	: That said, I am not a battle fighter (was a fencer) and have not seen a war in the last 8 years. I could be wrong, but that is the way of the wiki. Gaps can be filled by me. Errors can be corrected by others.		: That said, I am not a battle fighter (was a fencer) and have not seen a war in the last 8 years. I could be wrong, but that is the way of the wiki. Gaps can be filled by me. Errors can be corrected by others.
	:- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 09:37, 23 April 2009 (EST)		:- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 09:37, 23 April 2009 (EST)

			== Armigerous Baronial Awards ==

			Per the charters of the Aspen of Caerthe, the Golden Ring of Unser Hafen, the Hammer of Al-Barran and the Dragon's Claw of Dragonsspine:

			A. The award shall carry with it, subject to the pleasure of the Crown, an Award of Arms. Companions of the order shall take precedence after principality orders but before a simple Award of Arms.
			B. If the award is given to a person who bears an award carrying higher precedence than given above, his/her precedence shall remain unchanged.
			C. If the award is given to a person who has previously received an Award of Arms, his/her precedence shall date from his/her election to the Order.

			Retrieved from wimble.outlandsheralds.org Office of the Wimble Herald of the Outlands College of Heralds

			Baronial level awards in the Outlands by their charters default to carrying an Award of Arms unless otherwise specified in the charter. In 2006 the Barony of Unser Hafen specifically got permission to change this and to /not/ give AoAs with Baronial level awards; this required permission.

			Baronial awards granting status as an armiger is not governed by the Corpora but by the laws and traditions of an individual Kingdom; so the statement in the article Baronial Level Awards that BLAs are never Armigerous is both false and misleading.

Cian: /* Mixed Battles */

2009-04-22T23:37:22Z

Mixed Battles

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 23 April 2009
Line 22:		Line 22:
	[[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 10:55, 21 April 2009 (EST)		[[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 10:55, 21 April 2009 (EST)
	* I have tried to regionalise it. If it is better in your view, you can remove the rpov from it. - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]]		* I have tried to regionalise it. If it is better in your view, you can remove the rpov from it. - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]]
			* My only concern with your re-stab is the comment
			: "In some places, archers must be armoured to the regular standard, may carry secondary rattan weapons and are killed like any other fighter.".
			:I was under the belief that Society combat rules now state that all combatants must be armoured to the regular standard, which is now a "heavy" standard. There is no true "light" and "heavy" any more, even though the term is still used in Lochac to distinguish between melee and missile combatants. And I thought I had already handled multi-functional fighters ("mediums" to some) with my sentence
			: "Some of these fighters may wield both [[melee weapon\|melee]] and [[missile weapon]]s."
			:The final paragraph in this article was just trying to emphasis that with mixed combat, the gaps in your helms have to be thinner or meshed and the battle rules may specify that certain fighters may be defined as "light" and must be killed in the old-fashioned way that Lochac likes to use. I believe that is how Lochac has maintained its love for combat archery.
			: That said, I am not a battle fighter (was a fencer) and have not seen a war in the last 8 years. I could be wrong, but that is the way of the wiki. Gaps can be filled by me. Errors can be corrected by others.
			:- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 09:37, 23 April 2009 (EST)

Cian at 06:28, 22 April 2009

2009-04-22T06:28:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 22 April 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Hi Alexandre. I notice that you have marked [[Mixed battles]] as [[RPOV]]. Do you know of another meaning or have you just never heard of the term?		Hi Alexandre. I notice that you have marked [[Mixed battles]] as [[RPOV]]. Do you know of another meaning or have you just never heard of the term?
	[[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 10:55, 21 April 2009 (EST)		[[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 10:55, 21 April 2009 (EST)
			* I have tried to regionalise it. If it is better in your view, you can remove the rpov from it. - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]]

Cian: Mixed battles as RPOV

2009-04-21T00:55:32Z

Mixed battles as RPOV

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:55, 21 April 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Perhaps it would do better as a sub-page of heraldry, alongside Attributed Arms, maybe "Conceits in Heraldry"		Perhaps it would do better as a sub-page of heraldry, alongside Attributed Arms, maybe "Conceits in Heraldry"
	-- [[User:Simoncursitor\|Simoncursitor]] 23:30, 6 March 2009 (EST)		-- [[User:Simoncursitor\|Simoncursitor]] 23:30, 6 March 2009 (EST)

			== Mixed Battles ==
			Hi Alexandre. I notice that you have marked [[Mixed battles]] as [[RPOV]]. Do you know of another meaning or have you just never heard of the term?
			[[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 10:55, 21 April 2009 (EST)