<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ASiding</id>
	<title>Talk:Siding - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ASiding"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?title=Talk:Siding&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-20T15:11:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?title=Talk:Siding&amp;diff=25448&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Tiff at 02:39, 11 September 2005</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?title=Talk:Siding&amp;diff=25448&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2005-09-11T02:39:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;I wouldn&amp;#039;t say the way we do sidings is the most common.  In the SCA all american kingdoms, possibly everywhere except lochac dances them differently to this.  I&amp;#039;m not sure how other groups dance them, but I get the impression it&amp;#039;s at least a mixture, if not comming down more to the american way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The american way isn&amp;#039;t exactly a do-se-do, as I understand it (no passing behind the person).  It is a double left forwards, meeting at each other&amp;#039;s right shoulders (as we do, but taking longer to get there) and double back.  Since a siding right normally follows, you then get to do the opposite movement to the right.  It probably fits to the music slightly more easily (since the music doesn&amp;#039;t have a break mid double that marks when to change feet), but that&amp;#039;s no guarantee it was danced suchly - there seems to be plenty of places where a dance was squeezed to fit the music.  There is some beauty in the standardisiedness of it - during an arming your feet are still doing a simple double- but I&amp;#039;m need some convincing that ECD was so standardised at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
  Either version is equally mildly awkward when doing a siding left with your partner and a siding right with your contrary in heart&amp;#039;s ease, although a double forward probably is easier to catch up with if you forget what comes next and start the step late.  There might be some other dances for which a clear difference in ease of dancing exists between siding styles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few other ways to do sidings that have been proposed, some of which might be closer to a do-se-do, or at least j-shaped.  These seem to be massively out of favour with both SCA and ECD reenactors. (mostly because they were early reconstructions based on almost no evidence)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, I think i have the class notes from the KWDS class on this, but i remember most of the brief discussion on the topic (wished it was longer).  There&amp;#039;s a french dance book of english country dances around 1700, that is supposed to have a diagram of how sidings are done (there&amp;#039;s also some verbal descriptions a bit earlier).  I think both major schools of sidings claim it supports their version, so it would be facinating to see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mind you, I think some backwater sca bit do all kind of strange dance reconstructions, but they would find themselves as confused on the dance floor as i was at pennsic - everyone who dances away from home seems to do the style i described above, and not have seriously enountered other styles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] 21:39, 10 Sep 2005 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tiff</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>