Talk:Renaissance - Revision history

Simoncursitor: Reverted edits by 166.102.231.101 (Talk); changed back to last version by Tiff

2007-03-28T14:41:06Z

Reverted edits by 166.102.231.101 (Talk); changed back to last version by Tiff

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:41, 29 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			You know I'd really like to take a large knife to the links section of this page.
	you stink

			Saying something like:

			Whats in style? How do you say that in Renaissance?

			hi, we could reply to you easier if you logged in. Anyway, I can see that the article is leggy and overgrown - full of more links than content in sections. But I'd hate to just loose the links. Perhaps the links could be shifted off to a subpage on the relevant topic (eg Renaisance poets) and just a couple of links retained for the main page.
			As for your last sentence, maybe it's a crosscultural thing, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean here.
			[[User:Tiff\|Tiff]] 20:48, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)


			I rolled back the last entry, because I'm not sure about the veracity of the source (given it was only one sentence and very poorly (gramatically) written). If the author had logged in or written a previous contribution, I could have checked their other work to see if they had shown previous expertise in the area.
			[[User:Tiff\|Tiff]] 02:23, 22 May 2005 (CDT)

166.102.231.101 at 14:07, 28 March 2007

2007-03-28T14:07:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 29 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			you stink
	You know I'd really like to take a large knife to the links section of this page.

	Saying something like:

	Whats in style? How do you say that in Renaissance?

	hi, we could reply to you easier if you logged in. Anyway, I can see that the article is leggy and overgrown - full of more links than content in sections. But I'd hate to just loose the links. Perhaps the links could be shifted off to a subpage on the relevant topic (eg Renaisance poets) and just a couple of links retained for the main page.
	As for your last sentence, maybe it's a crosscultural thing, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean here.
	[[User:Tiff\|Tiff]] 20:48, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)


	I rolled back the last entry, because I'm not sure about the veracity of the source (given it was only one sentence and very poorly (gramatically) written). If the author had logged in or written a previous contribution, I could have checked their other work to see if they had shown previous expertise in the area.
	[[User:Tiff\|Tiff]] 02:23, 22 May 2005 (CDT)

Tiff at 07:23, 22 May 2005

2005-05-22T07:23:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 22 May 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:
	As for your last sentence, maybe it's a crosscultural thing, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean here.		As for your last sentence, maybe it's a crosscultural thing, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean here.
	[[User:Tiff\|Tiff]] 20:48, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)		[[User:Tiff\|Tiff]] 20:48, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)


			I rolled back the last entry, because I'm not sure about the veracity of the source (given it was only one sentence and very poorly (gramatically) written). If the author had logged in or written a previous contribution, I could have checked their other work to see if they had shown previous expertise in the area.
			[[User:Tiff\|Tiff]] 02:23, 22 May 2005 (CDT)

Tiff at 02:48, 8 February 2005

2005-02-08T02:48:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 8 February 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Whats in style? How do you say that in Renaissance?		Whats in style? How do you say that in Renaissance?

			hi, we could reply to you easier if you logged in. Anyway, I can see that the article is leggy and overgrown - full of more links than content in sections. But I'd hate to just loose the links. Perhaps the links could be shifted off to a subpage on the relevant topic (eg Renaisance poets) and just a couple of links retained for the main page.
			As for your last sentence, maybe it's a crosscultural thing, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean here.
			[[User:Tiff\|Tiff]] 20:48, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)

205.188.117.10: INFO

2005-02-05T12:26:50Z

INFO

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 5 February 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Saying something like:		Saying something like:

			Whats in style? How do you say that in Renaissance?
	== Important Renaissance Dance ==

	* Bla
	* Bla Bla
	* Bla Bla Bla

	... doesn't give any context. Watch my edits to see what I mean.

Del at 03:30, 9 November 2003

2003-11-09T03:30:47Z

New page

You know I'd really like to take a large knife to the links section of this page.

Saying something like:

== Important Renaissance Dance ==

* Bla
* Bla Bla
* Bla Bla Bla

... doesn't give any context. Watch my edits to see what I mean.