Talk:Master at Arms - Revision history

AlexandreDavigne at 14:10, 1 February 2007

2007-02-01T14:10:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, 2 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Masters of Arms are part of the Chivalry, but are not Knights. Basically, it's a knighthood for people who, for whatever reason, can't or won't swear Fealty to the Throne. [[User:Paul Matisz]] Aug 30, 12:10 EST		Masters of Arms are part of the Chivalry, but are not Knights. Basically, it's a knighthood for people who, for whatever reason, can't or won't swear Fealty to the Throne. [[User:Paul Matisz]] Aug 30, 12:10 EST
	* So Masters of Arms contribute to the polling just as much as knights? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]]		* So Masters of Arms contribute to the polling just as much as knights? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]]
			**Yes, from Corpora, "a. The Chivalry: The Chivalry consists of two equal parts: Knighthood and Mastery of Arms. No one may belong to both parts of the order at one time. When a member is admitted to the Chivalry by the Sovereign, the choice of which part of the order to join is made by the new member. The candidate must be considered the equal of his or her prospective peers with the basic weapons of tournament combat. To become a Knight, the candidate must swear fealty to the Crown of his or her kingdom during the knighting ceremony. Masters of Arms may choose to swear fealty, but are not required to do so." [[User:AlexandreDavigne\|AlexandreDavigne]] 01:10, 2 February 2007 (EST)

Cian at 00:10, 31 August 2006

2006-08-31T00:10:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:10, 31 August 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Masters of Arms are part of the Chivalry, but are not Knights. Basically, it's a knighthood for people who, for whatever reason, can't or won't swear Fealty to the Throne. [[User:Paul Matisz]] Aug 30, 12:10 EST		Masters of Arms are part of the Chivalry, but are not Knights. Basically, it's a knighthood for people who, for whatever reason, can't or won't swear Fealty to the Throne. [[User:Paul Matisz]] Aug 30, 12:10 EST
			* So Masters of Arms contribute to the polling just as much as knights? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]]

Paul Matisz at 16:07, 30 August 2006

2006-08-30T16:07:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 31 August 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Also, I was under the impression that Masters at Arms are not actually part of the [[Order of Chivalry]] and therefore not considered [[knight]]s. Is this so? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 13:01, 30 August 2006 (EST)		Also, I was under the impression that Masters at Arms are not actually part of the [[Order of Chivalry]] and therefore not considered [[knight]]s. Is this so? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 13:01, 30 August 2006 (EST)

	Masters of Arms are part of the Chivalry, but are not Knights. Basically, it's a knighthood for people who, for whatever reason, can't or won't swear Fealty to the Throne. [[~~user~~:Paul ~~Patisz~~]] Aug 30, 12:10 EST		Masters of Arms are part of the Chivalry, but are not Knights. Basically, it's a knighthood for people who, for whatever reason, can't or won't swear Fealty to the Throne. [[User:Paul Matisz]] Aug 30, 12:10 EST

Paul Matisz at 16:06, 30 August 2006

2006-08-30T16:06:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 31 August 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Also, I was under the impression that Masters at Arms are not actually part of the [[Order of Chivalry]] and therefore not considered [[knight]]s. Is this so? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 13:01, 30 August 2006 (EST)		Also, I was under the impression that Masters at Arms are not actually part of the [[Order of Chivalry]] and therefore not considered [[knight]]s. Is this so? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 13:01, 30 August 2006 (EST)

			Masters of Arms are part of the Chivalry, but are not Knights. Basically, it's a knighthood for people who, for whatever reason, can't or won't swear Fealty to the Throne. [[user:Paul Patisz]] Aug 30, 12:10 EST

Cian at 03:01, 30 August 2006

2006-08-30T03:01:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 30 August 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So is it [[Master at Arms]] or [[Master of Arms]]? Or both? What does the [[SCA]] [[corpora]] and the [[heraldic]] [[laws]] say? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 14:47, 8 Jun 2006 (EST)		So is it [[Master at Arms]] or [[Master of Arms]]? Or both? What does the [[SCA]] [[corpora]] and the [[heraldic]] [[laws]] say? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 14:47, 8 Jun 2006 (EST)

			Also, I was under the impression that Masters at Arms are not actually part of the [[Order of Chivalry]] and therefore not considered [[knight]]s. Is this so? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 13:01, 30 August 2006 (EST)

Cian: SCA terminology

2006-06-08T04:47:28Z

SCA terminology

New page

So is it [[Master at Arms]] or [[Master of Arms]]? Or both? What does the [[SCA]] [[corpora]] and the [[heraldic]] [[laws]] say? - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 14:47, 8 Jun 2006 (EST)