Talk:Marijuana - Revision history

Cian at 08:18, 24 July 2009

2009-07-24T08:18:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 24 July 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[User:Asfridhr\|Asfridhr]] 21:22, 21 July 2009 (EST)		[[User:Asfridhr\|Asfridhr]] 21:22, 21 July 2009 (EST)

	My Lady uses hemp fabric in her modern sewing for its absorbant quality. She says that yes, you can make hemp fabric from the same plant as marijuana but commercial hemp cloth is normally made from a plant that either doesn't have the hallucinatory component or they are present in such a negligible amount that it is of no concern. - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 23:06, 21 July 2009 (EST)		:My Lady uses hemp fabric in her modern sewing for its absorbant quality. She says that yes, you can make hemp fabric from the same plant as marijuana but commercial hemp cloth is normally made from a plant that either doesn't have the hallucinatory component or they are present in such a negligible amount that it is of no concern. - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 23:06, 21 July 2009 (EST)

	Agreed, ''Cannabis sp.'' the plant can be used in the production of fibres (hemp) and for an extract used in drugs (marijuana). The 'industrial' cannabis plants are generally those that produce more bast fibres, than THC.		::Agreed, ''Cannabis sp.'' the plant can be used in the production of fibres (hemp) and for an extract used in drugs (marijuana). The 'industrial' cannabis plants are generally those that produce more bast fibres, than THC.
	But the information on the [[hemp]] page doesn't really cover the fibre/textile use (I am happy to add that when I have time if no-one else does), and the [[marijuana]] page seems to have mixed in both cannabis 'types'.		::But the information on the [[hemp]] page doesn't really cover the fibre/textile use (I am happy to add that when I have time if no-one else does), and the [[marijuana]] page seems to have mixed in both cannabis 'types'.

	I think what I'm trying to say that the content between the two pages seems jumbled to me, and if they should be merged or the contents better separated or ''something''. Does that make more sense?		::I think what I'm trying to say that the content between the two pages seems jumbled to me, and if they should be merged or the contents better separated or ''something''. Does that make more sense?

	[[User:Asfridhr\|Asfridhr]] 18:36, 23 July 2009 (EST)		::[[User:Asfridhr\|Asfridhr]] 18:36, 23 July 2009 (EST)

			:::I certainly agreed that the pages need improving, but I would keep them as separate pages. Let the [[marijuana]] one talk about the [[medieval]] usage of the "drug" and [[SCA]] policies towards it (and its effects). The [[hemp]] one can discuss the medieval usage and production of hemp, whether it is the same as modern hemp and any advice on using modern hemp. I would get rid of the Dupont stuff. It's not relevant.

			:::Have a look at [[assassin]] for more related to hashish.
			::: - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 18:18, 24 July 2009 (EST)

Asfridhr at 08:36, 23 July 2009

2009-07-23T08:36:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 23 July 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:

	My Lady uses hemp fabric in her modern sewing for its absorbant quality. She says that yes, you can make hemp fabric from the same plant as marijuana but commercial hemp cloth is normally made from a plant that either doesn't have the hallucinatory component or they are present in such a negligible amount that it is of no concern. - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 23:06, 21 July 2009 (EST)		My Lady uses hemp fabric in her modern sewing for its absorbant quality. She says that yes, you can make hemp fabric from the same plant as marijuana but commercial hemp cloth is normally made from a plant that either doesn't have the hallucinatory component or they are present in such a negligible amount that it is of no concern. - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 23:06, 21 July 2009 (EST)

			Agreed, ''Cannabis sp.'' the plant can be used in the production of fibres (hemp) and for an extract used in drugs (marijuana). The 'industrial' cannabis plants are generally those that produce more bast fibres, than THC.
			But the information on the [[hemp]] page doesn't really cover the fibre/textile use (I am happy to add that when I have time if no-one else does), and the [[marijuana]] page seems to have mixed in both cannabis 'types'.

			I think what I'm trying to say that the content between the two pages seems jumbled to me, and if they should be merged or the contents better separated or ''something''. Does that make more sense?

			[[User:Asfridhr\|Asfridhr]] 18:36, 23 July 2009 (EST)

Cian at 13:06, 21 July 2009

2009-07-21T13:06:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 21 July 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Thanks!		Thanks!
	[[User:Asfridhr\|Asfridhr]] 21:22, 21 July 2009 (EST)		[[User:Asfridhr\|Asfridhr]] 21:22, 21 July 2009 (EST)

			My Lady uses hemp fabric in her modern sewing for its absorbant quality. She says that yes, you can make hemp fabric from the same plant as marijuana but commercial hemp cloth is normally made from a plant that either doesn't have the hallucinatory component or they are present in such a negligible amount that it is of no concern. - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 23:06, 21 July 2009 (EST)

Asfridhr: Comparing hemp and marijuana pages.

2009-07-21T11:22:03Z

Comparing hemp and marijuana pages.

New page

Could the [[Hemp]] and [[Marijuana]] contents be checked, by someone wiser than me, since...
a) How relevant is modern (ie. non-medieval) companies' campaigning against hemp fabrics, and biodiesels to a medieval-themed wiki?
b) There is repetition in the content between the two pages, since [[Hemp]] states it is different to [[Marijuana]], but [[Marijuana]] describes itself in terms of industrial [[hemp]].

Thanks!
[[User:Asfridhr|Asfridhr]] 21:22, 21 July 2009 (EST)