Talk:Kingdom of Gleann Abhann - Revision history

Yvesdelyle: Yvesdelyle moved page Talk:Gleann Abhann to Talk:Kingdom of Gleann Abhann: Moved to update the status

2017-03-17T10:18:05Z

Yvesdelyle moved page Talk:Gleann Abhann to Talk:Kingdom of Gleann Abhann: Moved to update the status

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:18, 17 March 2017
(No difference)

US71 at 14:53, 12 May 2007

2007-05-12T14:53:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 13 May 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:The general reason for this is that branches can get an upgrade, e.g. [[Principality of Lochac]] to [[Kingdom of Lochac]], [[canton]] to [[shire]] or [[barony]] etc. If [[Shire of XXXX]] is just a redirect to the actual text on [[XXXX]] then nothing will need to be moved when it becomes a [[principality]]. Otherwise, shifting the content of [[Shire of XXXX]] to [[Principality of XXXX]] (which makes [[Shire of XXXX]] a redirect) can very easily create a set of broken double redirects. Umm... understand what I am trying to say? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 16:08, 25 September 2006 (EST)		:The general reason for this is that branches can get an upgrade, e.g. [[Principality of Lochac]] to [[Kingdom of Lochac]], [[canton]] to [[shire]] or [[barony]] etc. If [[Shire of XXXX]] is just a redirect to the actual text on [[XXXX]] then nothing will need to be moved when it becomes a [[principality]]. Otherwise, shifting the content of [[Shire of XXXX]] to [[Principality of XXXX]] (which makes [[Shire of XXXX]] a redirect) can very easily create a set of broken double redirects. Umm... understand what I am trying to say? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 16:08, 25 September 2006 (EST)


			Do we really need links for the all individuals (kings, Queens, Knights)?

Cian: why not Shire of XXXX

2006-09-25T06:08:15Z

why not Shire of XXXX

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 25 September 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Good idea. I also notice many of the local groups are listed as (name) instead of Shire/Barony of (name). Maybe someone can fix those as well?		Good idea. I also notice many of the local groups are listed as (name) instead of Shire/Barony of (name). Maybe someone can fix those as well?

			:The general reason for this is that branches can get an upgrade, e.g. [[Principality of Lochac]] to [[Kingdom of Lochac]], [[canton]] to [[shire]] or [[barony]] etc. If [[Shire of XXXX]] is just a redirect to the actual text on [[XXXX]] then nothing will need to be moved when it becomes a [[principality]]. Otherwise, shifting the content of [[Shire of XXXX]] to [[Principality of XXXX]] (which makes [[Shire of XXXX]] a redirect) can very easily create a set of broken double redirects. Umm... understand what I am trying to say? - [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 16:08, 25 September 2006 (EST)

69.152.220.148 at 02:57, 25 September 2006

2006-09-25T02:57:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 25 September 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:

	This is the only one of the 19 kingdoms that doesn't have "Kingdom of" in its name/title - that should be fixed by a superuser for parallelism. [[User:Avraham haRofeh\|Avraham haRofeh]] 02:21, 5 September 2006 (EST)		This is the only one of the 19 kingdoms that doesn't have "Kingdom of" in its name/title - that should be fixed by a superuser for parallelism. [[User:Avraham haRofeh\|Avraham haRofeh]] 02:21, 5 September 2006 (EST)

			Good idea. I also notice many of the local groups are listed as (name) instead of Shire/Barony of (name). Maybe someone can fix those as well?

Avraham haRofeh at 16:21, 4 September 2006

2006-09-04T16:21:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 5 September 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Nice kingdom graphic. I like the laurel leaves. [[User:Sabine\|Sabine]] 06:08, 28 July 2006 (EST)		Nice kingdom graphic. I like the laurel leaves. [[User:Sabine\|Sabine]] 06:08, 28 July 2006 (EST)
	:Thank you --[[User:ThorgrimrGunnarrsson\|Thorgrimr of Dragonsspine]] 11:44, 28 July 2006 (EST)		:Thank you --[[User:ThorgrimrGunnarrsson\|Thorgrimr of Dragonsspine]] 11:44, 28 July 2006 (EST)

			This is the only one of the 19 kingdoms that doesn't have "Kingdom of" in its name/title - that should be fixed by a superuser for parallelism. [[User:Avraham haRofeh\|Avraham haRofeh]] 02:21, 5 September 2006 (EST)

ThorgrimrGunnarrsson at 01:44, 28 July 2006

2006-07-28T01:44:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 28 July 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Nice kingdom graphic. I like the laurel leaves. [[User:Sabine\|Sabine]] 06:08, 28 July 2006 (EST)		Nice kingdom graphic. I like the laurel leaves. [[User:Sabine\|Sabine]] 06:08, 28 July 2006 (EST)
			:Thank you --[[User:ThorgrimrGunnarrsson\|Thorgrimr of Dragonsspine]] 11:44, 28 July 2006 (EST)

Sabine at 20:08, 27 July 2006

2006-07-27T20:08:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:08, 28 July 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Thanks for the box...I have a copy of the Kingdom Arms I can upload.		Thanks for the box...I have a copy of the Kingdom Arms I can upload.

			Nice kingdom graphic. I like the laurel leaves. [[User:Sabine\|Sabine]] 06:08, 28 July 2006 (EST)

67.141.118.225 at 02:51, 15 January 2006

2006-01-15T02:51:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 15 January 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I added an SCA box based on the info that was there already. THus most of it is now unneeded, as it appears in the box. If someone has a better use for the space, knock yourself out. I figured I'd leave it if someone really prefered that to the nifty box most kingdoms have.		I added an SCA box based on the info that was there already. THus most of it is now unneeded, as it appears in the box. If someone has a better use for the space, knock yourself out. I figured I'd leave it if someone really prefered that to the nifty box most kingdoms have.

			Thanks for the box...I have a copy of the Kingdom Arms I can upload.

85.250.198.234 at 18:18, 10 January 2006

2006-01-10T18:18:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:18, 11 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Technically, Gleann Abhann became a Kingdom on October 1st (per the [[BoD]]). However, Coronation was postponed until November due to the ravages of Hurricane Katrina. [[User:US 71\|US 71]] 12:45, 10 Dec 2005 (CST)		Technically, Gleann Abhann became a Kingdom on October 1st (per the [[BoD]]). However, Coronation was postponed until November due to the ravages of Hurricane Katrina. [[User:US 71\|US 71]] 12:45, 10 Dec 2005 (CST)

			I added an SCA box based on the info that was there already. THus most of it is now unneeded, as it appears in the box. If someone has a better use for the space, knock yourself out. I figured I'd leave it if someone really prefered that to the nifty box most kingdoms have.

US 71 at 18:45, 10 December 2005

2005-12-10T18:45:51Z

New page

Technically, Gleann Abhann became a Kingdom on October 1st (per the [[BoD]]). However, Coronation was postponed until November due to the ravages of Hurricane Katrina. [[User:US 71|US 71]] 12:45, 10 Dec 2005 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 5 September 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Nice kingdom graphic. I like the laurel leaves. [[User:Sabine\|Sabine]] 06:08, 28 July 2006 (EST)		Nice kingdom graphic. I like the laurel leaves. [[User:Sabine\|Sabine]] 06:08, 28 July 2006 (EST)
	:Thank you --[[User:ThorgrimrGunnarrsson\|Thorgrimr of Dragonsspine]] 11:44, 28 July 2006 (EST)		:Thank you --[[User:ThorgrimrGunnarrsson\|Thorgrimr of Dragonsspine]] 11:44, 28 July 2006 (EST)

			This is the only one of the 19 kingdoms that doesn't have "Kingdom of" in its name/title - that should be fixed by a superuser for parallelism. [[User:Avraham haRofeh\|Avraham haRofeh]] 02:21, 5 September 2006 (EST)