Talk:Italian Renaissance - Revision history

Anton at 12:52, 13 November 2003

2003-11-13T12:52:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 13 November 2003
Line 45:		Line 45:

	Anton		Anton

			----

			Just stashing some weblinks here

			http://www.doaks.org/EconHist/EHB48.pdf ; interest and the Eastern Empire
			http://www.pims.ca/st144.pdf ; public debt in Early Ren. Flor.
			http://icf.som.yale.edu/pdf/hist_conference/Luciano_Pezzolo.pdf ; more montes

203.31.48.3 at 11:26, 13 November 2003

2003-11-13T11:26:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 13 November 2003
Line 34:		Line 34:

	[[User:Del\|Del]]		[[User:Del\|Del]]


			Del,

			We are talking about the same period right ?

			The 14th C depression and famines that led to/made the Black Plague worse ?

			I'll hit de Roover and the Cambridge Ec Hist Eur next time in in Chifley ...

			Anton

Del at 07:12, 13 November 2003

2003-11-13T07:12:00Z

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 [[User:Del|Del]]
 Del,
@@ Line 21: / Line 22: @@
 Anton

210.11.145.89 at 04:49, 13 November 2003

2003-11-13T04:49:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 13 November 2003
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[User:Del\|Del]]		[[User:Del\|Del]]


			Del,

			I'd disagree with 'the renaissence was the first time that they had huge chunks of cash to blow'. One of the reasons for the level of consipicous consumption during the Quattracentro was that the Med was going through a commercial recession - before that, you dumped spare money into making more money. During the recession, you could either lose it trying to trade goods or invest, or you could blow it on a nice palazzo or some paintings ...

			Anton

Del at 03:47, 13 November 2003

2003-11-13T03:47:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 13 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This probably needs to be edited, I've put the warning about neutrality at the top for now (it can be taken out once someone with more knowledge on the topic has a change to look at it). - [[User:Tobin\|Tobin]]		This probably needs to be edited, I've put the warning about neutrality at the top for now (it can be taken out once someone with more knowledge on the topic has a change to look at it). - [[User:Tobin\|Tobin]]

			----

			heheh.

			Of course I'll dispute the statement that says:

			''the Humanists concentrated on winning the argument rather than having their facts and logic straight''

			... until the cows come home, but it was written by an avowed scholastic.

			I'll re-write this article at some point but be aware I'm a humanist. I'll try to keep it neutral, though. I will concede the point that Italian princes blew huge chunks of cash on stuff, but then again the renaissance was the first time that they had huge chunks of cash to blow.

			[[User:Del\|Del]]

Tobin at 01:35, 13 November 2003

2003-11-13T01:35:29Z

New page

This probably needs to be edited, I've put the warning about neutrality at the top for now (it can be taken out once someone with more knowledge on the topic has a change to look at it). - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]]