Politics - Revision history

Simoncursitor at 10:23, 15 September 2005

2005-09-15T10:23:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 15 September 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.		'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.

	Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[medieval]] through to [[early modern]] politics include: [[Roman]] conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, [[Viking]] activity, the [[Church]], [[Aryanism]] and [[Catholicism]], [[Charlemagne]], the [[Pope]], the Empire, the Church again, the [[Goth]]ic, [[Vandal]], [[Magyar]], [[Hun]]nish, [[Khazar]], [[Mongol]] and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the [[Eastern Orthodox]] church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no resemblance to post-[[18th Century]] nationalism), the [[Danelaw]], the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and [[excommunication]], [[Crusade]]s and [[Jihad]], the [[Latin state]]s, the schism again, the [[city state]], Catholicism and the ~~Moslem~~ view of the [[Frank]]ish world, the Catholic view of the [[Muslim]] world, anti-papal [[reformation]]s, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and [[protestantism]], [[Niccolo Machiavelli]], [[Castiglione]], [[Mary I]] and [[Elizabeth I]], the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.		Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[medieval]] through to [[early modern]] politics include: [[Roman]] conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, [[Viking]] activity, the [[Church]], [[Aryanism]] and [[Catholicism]], [[Charlemagne]], the [[Pope]], the Empire, the Church again, the [[Goth]]ic, [[Vandal]], [[Magyar]], [[Hun]]nish, [[Khazar]], [[Mongol]] and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the [[Eastern Orthodox]] church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no resemblance to post-[[18th Century]] nationalism), the [[Danelaw]], the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and [[excommunication]], [[Crusade]]s and [[Jihad]], the [[Latin state]]s, the schism again, the [[city state]], Catholicism and the Muslim view of the [[Frank]]ish world, the Catholic view of the [[Muslim]] world, anti-papal [[reformation]]s, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and [[protestantism]], [[Niccolo Machiavelli]], [[Castiglione]], [[Mary I]] and [[Elizabeth I]], the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.

	Oh, and in no particular order.		Oh, and in no particular order.

Simoncursitor at 10:21, 15 September 2005

2005-09-15T10:21:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 15 September 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.		'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.

	Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[medieval]] through to [[early modern]] politics include: [[Roman]] conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, [[Viking]] activity, the [[Church]], [[Aryanism]] and [[Catholicism]], [[Charlemagne]], the [[Pope]], the Empire, the Church again, the [[Goth]]ic, [[Vandal]], [[Magyar]], [[Hun]]nish, [[Khazar]], [[Mongol]] and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the [[Eastern Orthodox]] church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no resemblance to post-[[18th Century]] nationalism), the [[Danelaw]], the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and [[excommunication]], [[Crusade]]s and [[Jihad]], the [[Latin state]]s, the schism again, the [[city state]], Catholicism and the Moslem view of the [[Frank]]ish world, the Catholic view of the ~~Moslem~~ world, anti-papal [[reformation]]s, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and [[protestantism]], [[Niccolo Machiavelli]], [[Castiglione]], [[Mary I]] and [[Elizabeth I]], the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.		Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[medieval]] through to [[early modern]] politics include: [[Roman]] conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, [[Viking]] activity, the [[Church]], [[Aryanism]] and [[Catholicism]], [[Charlemagne]], the [[Pope]], the Empire, the Church again, the [[Goth]]ic, [[Vandal]], [[Magyar]], [[Hun]]nish, [[Khazar]], [[Mongol]] and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the [[Eastern Orthodox]] church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no resemblance to post-[[18th Century]] nationalism), the [[Danelaw]], the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and [[excommunication]], [[Crusade]]s and [[Jihad]], the [[Latin state]]s, the schism again, the [[city state]], Catholicism and the Moslem view of the [[Frank]]ish world, the Catholic view of the [[Muslim]] world, anti-papal [[reformation]]s, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and [[protestantism]], [[Niccolo Machiavelli]], [[Castiglione]], [[Mary I]] and [[Elizabeth I]], the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.

	Oh, and in no particular order.		Oh, and in no particular order.

Morgant: Reverted edit of 213.187.69.90, changed back to last version by Cian

2005-02-17T23:59:04Z

Reverted edit of 213.187.69.90, changed back to last version by Cian

Show changes

213.187.69.90: despam

2005-02-17T16:37:47Z

despam

Show changes

Cian: lots of links

2004-07-23T05:43:20Z

lots of links

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 23 July 2004
Line 5:		Line 5:
	'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.		'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.

	Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[medieval]] through to [[early modern]] politics include: Roman conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, Viking activity, the Church, Aryanism and Catholicism, Charlemagne, the Pope, the Empire, the Church again, the ~~Gothic~~, Vandal, Magyar, ~~Hunnish~~, Khazar, Mongol and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the Eastern Orthodox church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no ~~resemblence~~ to post-18th C nationalism), the Danelaw, the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and excommunication, ~~Crusades~~ and Jihad, the Latin ~~states~~, the schism again, the city state, Catholicism and the Moslem view of the ~~Frankish~~ world, the Catholic view of the Moslem world, anti-papal ~~reformations~~, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and protestantism, Niccolo ~~Macciavelli~~, Castiglione, Mary I and Elizabeth I, the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.		Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[medieval]] through to [[early modern]] politics include: [[Roman]] conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, [[Viking]] activity, the [[Church]], [[Aryanism]] and [[Catholicism]], [[Charlemagne]], the [[Pope]], the Empire, the Church again, the [[Goth]]ic, [[Vandal]], [[Magyar]], [[Hun]]nish, [[Khazar]], [[Mongol]] and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the [[Eastern Orthodox]] church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no resemblance to post-[[18th Century]] nationalism), the [[Danelaw]], the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and [[excommunication]], [[Crusade]]s and [[Jihad]], the [[Latin state]]s, the schism again, the [[city state]], Catholicism and the Moslem view of the [[Frank]]ish world, the Catholic view of the Moslem world, anti-papal [[reformation]]s, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and [[protestantism]], [[Niccolo Machiavelli]], [[Castiglione]], [[Mary I]] and [[Elizabeth I]], the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.

	Oh, and in no particular order.		Oh, and in no particular order.

Del: typo

2003-11-17T05:20:24Z

typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 17 November 2003
Line 5:		Line 5:
	'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.		'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.

	Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[early modern]] politics include: Roman conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, Viking activity, the Church, Aryanism and Catholicism, Charlemagne, the Pope, the Empire, the Church again, the Gothic, Vandal, Magyar, Hunnish, Khazar, Mongol and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the Eastern Orthodox church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no resemblence to post-18th C nationalism), the Danelaw, the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and excommunication, Crusades and Jihad, the Latin states, the schism again, the city state, Catholicism and the Moslem view of the Frankish world, the Catholic view of the Moslem world, anti-papal reformations, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and protestantism, Niccolo Macciavelli, Castiglione, Mary I and Elizabeth I, the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.		Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[medieval]] through to [[early modern]] politics include: Roman conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, Viking activity, the Church, Aryanism and Catholicism, Charlemagne, the Pope, the Empire, the Church again, the Gothic, Vandal, Magyar, Hunnish, Khazar, Mongol and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the Eastern Orthodox church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no resemblence to post-18th C nationalism), the Danelaw, the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and excommunication, Crusades and Jihad, the Latin states, the schism again, the city state, Catholicism and the Moslem view of the Frankish world, the Catholic view of the Moslem world, anti-papal reformations, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and protestantism, Niccolo Macciavelli, Castiglione, Mary I and Elizabeth I, the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.

	Oh, and in no particular order.		Oh, and in no particular order.

Del at 01:06, 17 November 2003

2003-11-17T01:06:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 17 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''The neutrality and accuracy of this article is disputed''

	'''Politics''' is the study of decision-making power (who's got it, and who hasn't). '''Politics''' can take many forms -- discussions, arguments, etc.		'''Politics''' is the study of decision-making power (who's got it, and who hasn't). '''Politics''' can take many forms -- discussions, arguments, etc.

	== Period politics ==		== Period politics ==

	'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] largely revolved around who had the largest sharp [[sword]], or who had the most friends with sharp [[sword]]s. '''Politics''' also revolved around who was in power in the [[Church]], who was wearing the [[Crown]], and who had the favour of those in power in those institutions. The resolution of [[political dispute]]s was made primarily by [[war]]s rather than [[diplomacy]], however the influence of the [[pope]] and the institutions surrounding the [[papacy]] meant that the [[Church]] was also heavily involved in the resolution of [[political dispute]]s.
			'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] is a very complex subject. Very much like politics is today. Too complex to fit on this page.

			Some of the things that need covering in a discussion of [[early modern]] politics include: Roman conquests, neo-Roman (eg: romano-british) activity, Viking activity, the Church, Aryanism and Catholicism, Charlemagne, the Pope, the Empire, the Church again, the Gothic, Vandal, Magyar, Hunnish, Khazar, Mongol and Gothic (again) invasions and settlements, the Eastern Orthodox church, the schisms, the other schisms, early nationalism (which bears no resemblence to post-18th C nationalism), the Danelaw, the Roman law and interpretations of Roman law, secular and temporal law, the Empire again, Papal authority and excommunication, Crusades and Jihad, the Latin states, the schism again, the city state, Catholicism and the Moslem view of the Frankish world, the Catholic view of the Moslem world, anti-papal reformations, the nationalist churches, the city states again, the reformation and protestantism, Niccolo Macciavelli, Castiglione, Mary I and Elizabeth I, the foundation of the papal and catholic plots against Elizabeth, 1588 and the armada, and at about that point we run out of time.

			Oh, and in no particular order.

	== Politics in the SCA ==		== Politics in the SCA ==
	'''Politics''' in the [[SCA]] usually revolves around the [[officer]]s and [[peer]]s of the SCA, not to mention the [[Crown]]. Fortunately, in the case of the latter, we have a system that is very similar to the system in place in the [[Middle Ages]] in that the strongest person with the largest (in our case blunt) [[sword]] is the winner.		'''Politics''' in the [[SCA]] usually revolves around the [[officer]]s and [[peer]]s of the SCA, not to mention the [[Crown]]. Fortunately, in the case of the latter, we have a system that is very similar to the system in place in the early [[Middle Ages]] in that the strongest person with the largest (in our case blunt) [[sword]] is the winner.

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Tobin: neutrality and accuracy note

2003-11-16T03:30:15Z

neutrality and accuracy note

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 16 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
			''The neutrality and accuracy of this article is disputed''

	'''Politics''' is the study of decision-making power (who's got it, and who hasn't). '''Politics''' can take many forms -- discussions, arguments, etc.		'''Politics''' is the study of decision-making power (who's got it, and who hasn't). '''Politics''' can take many forms -- discussions, arguments, etc.

Line 10:		Line 12:

	* [[Politics in the Renaissance]]		* [[Politics in the Renaissance]]



	** See Talk before you apply any weight to this article - Anton *

210.9.138.6 at 23:12, 15 November 2003

2003-11-15T23:12:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 16 November 2003
Line 10:		Line 10:

	* [[Politics in the Renaissance]]		* [[Politics in the Renaissance]]



			** See Talk before you apply any weight to this article - Anton *

Tobin at 01:31, 15 November 2003

2003-11-15T01:31:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 15 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Politics''' is the study of decision-making power (who's got it, and who hasn't). '''Politics''' can take many forms -- discussions, arguments, etc.		'''Politics''' is the study of decision-making power (who's got it, and who hasn't). '''Politics''' can take many forms -- discussions, arguments, etc.

			== Period politics ==
	'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] largely revolved around who had the largest sharp [[sword]], or who had the most friends with sharp [[sword]]s. '''Politics''' also revolved around who was in power in the [[Church]], who was wearing the [[Crown]], and who had the favour of those in power in those institutions. The resolution of [[political dispute]]s was made primarily by [[war]]s rather than [[diplomacy]], however the influence of the [[pope]] and the institutions surrounding the [[papacy]] meant that the [[Church]] was also heavily involved in the resolution of [[political dispute]]s.		'''Politics''' within the [[Middle Ages]] and the [[Renaissance]] largely revolved around who had the largest sharp [[sword]], or who had the most friends with sharp [[sword]]s. '''Politics''' also revolved around who was in power in the [[Church]], who was wearing the [[Crown]], and who had the favour of those in power in those institutions. The resolution of [[political dispute]]s was made primarily by [[war]]s rather than [[diplomacy]], however the influence of the [[pope]] and the institutions surrounding the [[papacy]] meant that the [[Church]] was also heavily involved in the resolution of [[political dispute]]s.

			== Politics in the SCA ==
	'''Politics''' in the [[SCA]] usually revolves around the [[officer]]s and [[peer]]s of the SCA, not to mention the [[Crown]]. Fortunately, in the case of the latter, we have a system that is very similar to the system in place in the [[Middle Ages]] in that the strongest person with the largest (in our case blunt) [[sword]] is the winner.		'''Politics''' in the [[SCA]] usually revolves around the [[officer]]s and [[peer]]s of the SCA, not to mention the [[Crown]]. Fortunately, in the case of the latter, we have a system that is very similar to the system in place in the [[Middle Ages]] in that the strongest person with the largest (in our case blunt) [[sword]] is the winner.