Out of period - Revision history

Paul Matisz at 01:32, 18 June 2008

2008-06-18T01:32:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 18 June 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Some items that are OOP are considered by some to be "[[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them. This would seem to be a regional use or concept. Many places simply acknowledge them as OOP but use them anyway.		Some items that are OOP are considered by some to be "[[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them. This would seem to be a regional use or concept. Many places simply acknowledge them as OOP but use them anyway.

			Occasionally, <B>OoP</b> is used by [[herald]]s as a shorthand for the [[Order of Precedence]], but this is not as common as usage.

	[[category:SCAism]]		[[category:SCAism]]

User 144: Reverted edits by 61.235.241.69 (Talk); changed back to last version by AlexandreDavigne

2007-11-09T22:48:16Z

Reverted edits by 61.235.241.69 (Talk); changed back to last version by AlexandreDavigne

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 10 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	rozelro
	'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated '''OOP''') refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame covered by the [[SCA]]. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].		'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated '''OOP''') refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame covered by the [[SCA]]. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].

61.235.241.69 at 19:41, 9 November 2007

2007-11-09T19:41:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:41, 10 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			rozelro
	'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated '''OOP''') refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame covered by the [[SCA]]. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].		'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated '''OOP''') refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame covered by the [[SCA]]. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].

AlexandreDavigne at 12:24, 19 October 2006

2006-10-19T12:24:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 19 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated '''OOP''') refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame ~~accepted to be~~ covered by the [[SCA]]. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].		'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated '''OOP''') refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame covered by the [[SCA]]. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].

	Some items that ~~would technically be~~ OOP are considered ~~"in~~ [[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them.		Some items that are OOP are considered by some to be "[[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them. This would seem to be a regional use or concept. Many places simply acknowledge them as OOP but use them anyway.

	[[category:SCAism]]		[[category:SCAism]]

Cian at 05:59, 19 October 2006

2006-10-19T05:59:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 19 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated OOP) refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame accepted to be covered by the SCA. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].		'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated '''OOP''') refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame accepted to be covered by the [[SCA]]. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].

	Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in [[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them.		Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in [[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them.

Paul Matisz: added category

2006-04-26T00:36:10Z

added category

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 26 April 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in [[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them.		Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in [[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them.

			[[category:SCAism]]

JakeVortex: removed content covered in period by consensus

2003-11-04T01:50:12Z

removed content covered in period by consensus

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 4 November 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated OOP) refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame accepted to be covered by the SCA. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].		'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated OOP) refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame accepted to be covered by the SCA. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].

	Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in [[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them. ~~Some examples include:~~		Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in [[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them.
	* [[duct tape]]
	* [[gumbies]]
	* [[coffee]] (ie for non-eastern personas)
	* [[cigarettes]]
	* [[cable ties]]

Newt at 00:56, 17 July 2003

2003-07-17T00:56:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 17 July 2003
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* [[coffee]] (ie for non-eastern personas)		* [[coffee]] (ie for non-eastern personas)
	* [[cigarettes]]		* [[cigarettes]]
			* [[cable ties]]

129.78.228.114 at 16:52, 11 July 2003

2003-07-11T16:52:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 12 July 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated OOP) refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame accepted to be covered by the SCA. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].		'''Out Of Period''' (often abbreviated OOP) refers to anything that was not discovered or in general use during the time-frame accepted to be covered by the SCA. By contrast, anything that falls within the accepted time-frame is said to be "in period" or simply [[period]].

	Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in period by consensus" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them. Some examples include:		Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in [[period by consensus]]" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them. Some examples include:
	* [[duct tape]]		* [[duct tape]]
	* [[gumbies]]		* [[gumbies]]

129.78.64.101 at 15:44, 30 June 2003

2003-06-30T15:44:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 1 July 2003
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in period by consensus" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them. Some examples include:		Some items that would technically be OOP are considered "in period by consensus" (not sure of the exact phrasing) as life would be way too difficult without them. Some examples include:
	* [[duct tape]]		* [[duct tape]]
			* [[gumbies]]
	* [[coffee]] (ie for non-eastern personas)		* [[coffee]] (ie for non-eastern personas)
	* [[cigarettes]]		* [[cigarettes]]