Challenge tournament - Revision history

Averykrouse at 18:26, 10 November 2010

2010-11-10T18:26:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 11 November 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	This system also works in [[ransom melee]]s.		This system also works in [[ransom melee]]s.

	[[Category:combat]]
			{{Tournaments}}
			[[Category:Tournament Styles]][[Category:combat]]

Cian: Reverted edits by 81.201.58.55 (Talk); changed back to last version by User 144

2007-10-24T23:48:37Z

Reverted edits by 81.201.58.55 (Talk); changed back to last version by User 144

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:48, 25 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	actrernomona
	A '''Challenge tournament''' is probably the easiest [[tournament style\|style of tournament]] to run. You get all your [[fighter]]s together, one fighter [[challenge]]s another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[Lists Officer\|lists officer]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the lists officer records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.		A '''Challenge tournament''' is probably the easiest [[tournament style\|style of tournament]] to run. You get all your [[fighter]]s together, one fighter [[challenge]]s another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[Lists Officer\|lists officer]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the lists officer records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.
	If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.		If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.

81.201.58.55 at 23:32, 24 October 2007

2007-10-24T23:32:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 25 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			actrernomona
	A '''Challenge tournament''' is probably the easiest [[tournament style\|style of tournament]] to run. You get all your [[fighter]]s together, one fighter [[challenge]]s another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[Lists Officer\|lists officer]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the lists officer records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.		A '''Challenge tournament''' is probably the easiest [[tournament style\|style of tournament]] to run. You get all your [[fighter]]s together, one fighter [[challenge]]s another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[Lists Officer\|lists officer]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the lists officer records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.
	If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.		If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.

User 144: categorising

2006-05-20T12:49:38Z

categorising

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 20 May 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:

	This system also works in [[ransom melee]]s.		This system also works in [[ransom melee]]s.
			[[Category:combat]]

Cian at 03:41, 4 October 2004

2004-10-04T03:41:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 4 October 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~This~~ ~~style~~ ~~of [[~~tournament]] is probably the easiest to run. You get all your [[fighter]]s together, one fighter [[challenge]]s another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[Lists Officer\|lists officer]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the lists officer records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.		A '''Challenge tournament''' is probably the easiest [[tournament style\|style of tournament]] to run. You get all your [[fighter]]s together, one fighter [[challenge]]s another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[Lists Officer\|lists officer]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the lists officer records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.
	If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.		If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.

Cian: ransom melee link

2004-06-21T02:04:56Z

ransom melee link

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 21 June 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This style of tournament is probably the easiest to run. You get all your ~~fighters~~ together, one fighter ~~challenges~~ another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[~~list~~ ~~keeper~~]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the ~~list~~ ~~keeper~~ records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.		This style of [[tournament]] is probably the easiest to run. You get all your [[fighter]]s together, one fighter [[challenge]]s another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[Lists Officer\|lists officer]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the lists officer records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.
	If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.		If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.

			This system also works in [[ransom melee]]s.

Morgant: typo

2003-10-02T11:43:04Z

typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:43, 2 October 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This style of tournament is probably the easiest to run. You get all your fighters together, one fighter challenges another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[list keeper]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the list keeper records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more ~~fight~~ can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.		This style of tournament is probably the easiest to run. You get all your fighters together, one fighter challenges another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[list keeper]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the list keeper records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fights can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.
	If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.		If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.

Morgant: wiki

2003-10-02T11:42:45Z

wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 2 October 2003
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This style of tournament is probably the easiest to run. You get all your fighters together, one fighter challenges another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[list keeper]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the list keeper records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fight can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the hit list might become a little disproportioned.		This style of tournament is probably the easiest to run. You get all your fighters together, one fighter challenges another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[list keeper]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the list keeper records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fight can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the [[hit list]] might become a little disproportioned.
	If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.		If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.

211.29.150.92 at 23:51, 16 July 2003

2003-07-16T23:51:39Z

New page

This style of tournament is probably the easiest to run. You get all your fighters together, one fighter challenges another fighter, they fight, the loser goes to the [[list keeper]] to tell them who their opponent was (so the list keeper records the wins/losses for each fighter). This means fighters can fight as much as they like and more fight can be carried out at one time, although it also means that the hit list might become a little disproportioned.
If one fighter only fights twice but wins both times, they have a 100% winning average, yet someone who has fought twelve bouts but lost four of them will only have a 66.66% winning average.