Category talk:Combat - Revision history

Morgant: combat (historical)?

2005-08-18T07:23:04Z

combat (historical)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 18 August 2005
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The problem is then where to put what. [[Tournament]] can be [[:category:combat]] but [[Tournament style]]s might be best as [[:category:combat (SCA)]]. [[SCA sword]] is [[:category:weapons]] which is a subpart of [[:category:combat]] but should it also be a part of [[:category:combat (SCA)]]? This is the sort of issue I was having. Those examples are but the tip of the phalanx. I have no problems with cross-categorisation but this has to limited, rather than making almost every member of one category also appear in another category.		The problem is then where to put what. [[Tournament]] can be [[:category:combat]] but [[Tournament style]]s might be best as [[:category:combat (SCA)]]. [[SCA sword]] is [[:category:weapons]] which is a subpart of [[:category:combat]] but should it also be a part of [[:category:combat (SCA)]]? This is the sort of issue I was having. Those examples are but the tip of the phalanx. I have no problems with cross-categorisation but this has to limited, rather than making almost every member of one category also appear in another category.
	- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:51, 14 Aug 2005 (CDT)		- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:51, 14 Aug 2005 (CDT)

			How about we have [[:category:combat (historical)]], and [[:category:combat (SCA)]]?
			- [[User:Morgant\|Morgant]] 02:23, 18 Aug 2005 (CDT)

Cian at 00:53, 15 August 2005

2005-08-15T00:53:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 15 August 2005
Line 23:		Line 23:
	- [[User: Conrad Leviston\|Conrad]] 09:09, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)		- [[User: Conrad Leviston\|Conrad]] 09:09, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)

	The problem is then where to put what. [[Tournament]] can be [[:category:combat]] but [[Tournament ~~styles~~]] might be best as [[:category:combat (SCA)]]. [[SCA sword]] is [[:category:weapons]] which is a subpart of [[:category:combat]] but should it also be a part of [[:category:combat (SCA)]]? This is the sort of issue I was having. Those examples are but the tip of the phalanx. I have no problems with cross-categorisation but this has to limited, rather than making almost every member of one category also appear in another category.		The problem is then where to put what. [[Tournament]] can be [[:category:combat]] but [[Tournament style]]s might be best as [[:category:combat (SCA)]]. [[SCA sword]] is [[:category:weapons]] which is a subpart of [[:category:combat]] but should it also be a part of [[:category:combat (SCA)]]? This is the sort of issue I was having. Those examples are but the tip of the phalanx. I have no problems with cross-categorisation but this has to limited, rather than making almost every member of one category also appear in another category.
	- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:51, 14 Aug 2005 (CDT)		- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:51, 14 Aug 2005 (CDT)

Cian: where to put what dilemma

2005-08-15T00:51:54Z

where to put what dilemma

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 15 August 2005
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I agree. The [[:category:combat (SCA)]] format works best for me too.		I agree. The [[:category:combat (SCA)]] format works best for me too.
	- 09:09, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)		- [[User: Conrad Leviston\|Conrad]] 09:09, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)

			The problem is then where to put what. [[Tournament]] can be [[:category:combat]] but [[Tournament styles]] might be best as [[:category:combat (SCA)]]. [[SCA sword]] is [[:category:weapons]] which is a subpart of [[:category:combat]] but should it also be a part of [[:category:combat (SCA)]]? This is the sort of issue I was having. Those examples are but the tip of the phalanx. I have no problems with cross-categorisation but this has to limited, rather than making almost every member of one category also appear in another category.
			- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:51, 14 Aug 2005 (CDT)

Conrad Leviston at 14:09, 13 August 2005

2005-08-13T14:09:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 14 August 2005
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Those are good ideas, Cian. I'd go for the subdivisions - what do other people think?		Those are good ideas, Cian. I'd go for the subdivisions - what do other people think?
	- [[User:Morgant\|Morgant]] 01:27, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT)		- [[User:Morgant\|Morgant]] 01:27, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT)

			I agree. The [[:category:combat (SCA)]] format works best for me too.
			- 09:09, 13 Aug 2005 (CDT)

Morgant: response

2005-08-12T06:27:38Z

response

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 12 August 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Should we be careful to break up the members into further [[SCA]]-specific categories? Should there be a general [[:category:combat]] and a [[:category:combat (SCA)]]?		Should we be careful to break up the members into further [[SCA]]-specific categories? Should there be a general [[:category:combat]] and a [[:category:combat (SCA)]]?
	- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 01:15, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT)		- [[User:Cian\|Cian Gillebhrath]] 01:15, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT)

			Those are good ideas, Cian. I'd go for the subdivisions - what do other people think?
			- [[User:Morgant\|Morgant]] 01:27, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT)

Cian: Cian's concerns for this category

2005-08-12T06:15:34Z

Cian's concerns for this category

New page

This [[:special:categories|category]] has always given me concern, which is why I have never defined it or made many members for it. There are many possible members for it, but I wonder if it should have a number of subcategories or be really subdivided. For instance, members could be
* [[fighter]]
* [[archery]]
* [[war]]
* [[marshal]]
* [[rules of the list]]
* [[Wars of the Roses]]
* [[authorisation]]
* [[helm]]
But we already have categories for
* [[:category:battles (medieval)]]
* [[:category:armour]]
* [[:category:SCA armour]]
* [[:category:weapons]]
* [[:category:battles]]
Should we be careful to break up the members into further [[SCA]]-specific categories? Should there be a general [[:category:combat]] and a [[:category:combat (SCA)]]?
- [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 01:15, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT)