View source for Category talk:Device heraldry

Two more [[wiki]] pages needed "[[fimbriated]]" and "[[mulletty]]". From recent [[Lochac]] discussions, ''fimbriated'' seems to indicate that a [[charge]], [[line division|division]] or [[ordinary]] is surrounded by a [[border]] of a certain [[tincture]]. ''Mulletty'' seems to say the division or ordinary is filled with [[mullet]]s. Can someone who is more in the know complete these pages and link to them on appropriate pages (cf. [[Kingdom of the East]]'s [[device]]). - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:34, 9 Aug 2005 (CDT)

*<strike>As far as I know fimbriated only applies to ordinaries.</strike> Fimbriation applies to simple charges only (including any ordinary). Your basic description is correct though. As well as fimbriated we need [[cotised]]. As for mulletty, it may be just as well to create a redirect to [[mullet]] and add the information there. Thanks for the heads up. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 01:07, 10 Aug 2005 (CDT)
----
Should all entries in [[:category:heraldic poses]] also be in [[:category:device heraldry]]? cf. [[Couchant]]. I would say no. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 01:51, 17 Oct 2005 (CDT)
* I would agree; there's no need to fill out device heraldry with poses.  They're two seperate things, really (a lion is a device, whether it's dormant or statent).  IIRC, poses don't count for a CD as far as submission is concerned, while devices do, so there's precedent for keeping the two apart. [[User:Thomas|Thomas]] 07:28, 17 Oct 2005 (CDT)
** Actually, a lion is a ''charge''. Postures '''do'' count for a CD, under SCA Rules for Submission. A lion rampant has a counted difference from a lion passant. - [[User:Maccormaic|Roberd]] 17:13, 31 Dec 2005 (CST)
*I would say no as well. As a general rule of thumb I would avoid categorising something under both a category and its subcategory. Ahem. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 08:07, 17 Oct 2005 (CDT)