View source for Talk:Kingdom

Someone stop me if I'm wrong but shouldn't "Kingdom of Aethelmarc" read as "Kingdom of �thelmarc"? If no one has a problem with me fixing this I'll do so tomorrow. And I'll change the other popular spellings to redirects. - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] 12:22 29 Jun 2003 (EST)

Actually, it should be �thelmearc (mearc, not marc) [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad]]

=== Order ===

I know that Lochach is near and dear to most of the contributors hearts, but I find the order of the kingdoms to be curious. Is there any reason not to put them in order of precedence?

Also, should we have a one line blurb for each kingdom? Could we tighten it up so it fits on one line? E.g., maybe just the year of formation rather than the full date. Details will be in the page for that kingdom anyway. ~ [[User:JakeVortex|JakeVortex]] 04:40, 5 Nov 2003 (EST)
:I'd say the list should be changed, as long as there is a good reason for the new order (you might want to add a short note about the order of the list to the article) - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]]
::Done. Fix it, or let me know if it causes heartburn. ;-> ~ [[User:JakeVortex|JakeVortex]]

== Clean up==
We need to change this to a page for SCA kingdoms (or rather SCA kingdom timeline/OoP. The redirect for [[kingdom]] needs to be changed to its own page that can describe what was a [[period]] kingdom and what is an SCA kingdom (ala [[barony]], [[canton]], etc). It can have a link to the new version of this page. There should be no [[kingdoms]] page as it is a plural title. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 17:54, 12 Nov 2005 (CST)

:There is no doubt that we need a page that includes both SCA and historical kingdoms on it. I would personally leave the list of SCA kingdoms on this page until such time as the page becomes too cluttered. I agree with you regarding the plural title, and have changed it. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 22:35, 12 Nov 2005 (CST)