https://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Yevaul&feedformat=atomCunnan - User contributions [en]2024-03-28T16:08:27ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.39.3https://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?title=Alchemy&diff=15905Alchemy2006-04-28T04:44:31Z<p>Yevaul: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''Alchemy''', being a sacred science (a marriage of science and spirituality, flourishing at times when there is no seperation made between the two), is often misrepresented as a strictly medieval European phenomenon. Quite to the contrary, it has thrived across the globe, in many different countries, rooting itself in the histories of various cultures. Egypt, India, China, Greece, Rome, and the Islamic Empire all at one time or another were home to the furnaces and laboratories of devoted alchemists.<br />
<br />
For the sake of brevity, however, this article will focus on alchemy as it is known in the West, during the medieval and Rennaisance periods of history.<br />
<br />
<br />
== History ==<br />
<br />
The oldest alchemical text known to date was written by the Gnostic Christian, Zosimus of Panopolis, sometime around 300 A.D. Despite his title, Zosimus lived in Alexandria, home to the famous Library of Alexandria (the burning of which was perhaps one of the greatest tragedies in history; many other alchemical treatises most probably were lost forevern in this same fire). <br />
<br />
This text, named "Isis the Prophetess to Her Son Horus" claims that the origins of alchemy come from the Nephilim, the Fallen Angels, who taught it to Isis in exchange for sexual intercourse. Not to be confused with any kind of demonic entities, the Nephilim were said to be great teachers and guides for the human race, helping us along with everything from war to cosmetics.<br />
<br />
About one hundred years earler in Hellenized Egypt bloomed the Hermetic tradition which still remains vital and alive even today, providing fertile ground for the Rosicrucian Order, which in turn gave rise to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. The Corpus Hermeticum, an extremely important body of writing for both the ancient and modern alchemist, . The Emerald Tablet, the "cornerstone of the Hermetic movement" was said to be first recieved by Adam from an angel before the <br />
probably influenced by the [[Egypt]]ians and the [[Greek Philosophy]] of [[Democritus]].<br />
<br />
It is based on the idea that the world is composed of the four elements [[fire]], air, water and earth. These elements are considered to be contained in all things, the most common example being wood which "obviously" contained earth (which was why it was hard) and water (sap when squeezed out) and air (smoke when lit) and fire (you could light it). It was a nice little theory...<br />
<br />
The basic idea of the atom as the "smallest unit of divisibility" was also formed during this time - though this truly bears little relation to the present-day concept of the atom (which is merely named after the Democritian concept). Atoms were considered to be tiny, perfect spheres and made up of one of the four above-mentioned elements...considering the scientific state-of-the-art up to that point, not a bad theory, and one which lasted surprisingly long.<br />
<br />
One of the concepts was that, because [[lead]] and [[gold]] (the perfect metal) were from the earth element, earth could therefore be turned into lead and gold using an "appropriate catalyst" known as the [[Philosophers stone|Philosopher's Stone]]. This was a magical substance which could turn water into [[wine]], heal the sick, and as mentioned, turn really boring lumps of metal into gold and [[silver]]. Most of it though was just processes like mixing [[copper]] with [[arsenic]] to give it a silver finish, or a philosophical trick by which the alchemist's [[apprentice]], through years of hard work and training, was turned from lead (i.e. an ignorant klutz) into gold (i.e. an alchemically educated klutz).<br />
<br />
The quest to turn lead into gold was also a spiritual one, as it represented the change of an impure substance into a pure substance - the equivalent of returning Man from his current state of sin to a state of Grace last known before the Fall.<br />
<br />
Despite never discovering the Philosopher's Stone, alchemists did come up with a number of interesting reactions and the knowledge gathered eventually led to the foundations of modern [[chemistry]].<br />
<br />
Alchemy also gave rise to concept of the [[panacea]], the "[[medicine]]" to cure all illnesses - also never found, but a search for it led to an interesting number of ways to [[poison]] oneself (mercury, silver and lead poisoning being numbered under the chief ways that alchemists died).<br />
<br />
== Links ==<br />
<br />
; [http://www.alchemywebsite.com/ The Alchemy Website] (mirrored at [http://www.levity.com/alchemy www.levity.com/alchemy]) : A site for modern alchemists; do not expect that modern alchemy is necessarily related to period alchemy.</div>Yevaulhttps://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?title=Talk:Alchemy&diff=26209Talk:Alchemy2006-04-28T03:22:48Z<p>Yevaul: New Article</p>
<hr />
<div>With all due respect, the author of this article is completely misinformed, and espouses to the most common misunderstandings concerning alchemy. If the author had bothered to explore the topic without any modern scientific bias (a good start would've been the link attached at the end), then this article might have more merit.<br />
--[[User:Yevaul|Yevaul]] 19:34, 2 Mar 2006 (CST)<br />
* Granted that topics like [[alchemy]] may have many interpretations as it has a basis in belief, but the page also had [http://cunnan.sca.org.au/index.php?title=Alchemy&action=history many authors]. Such is the way of the [[wiki]]. Should you wish to summarise an alternative version of what [[medieval]] or [[renaissance]] alchemy broadly was, then you are welcome to add your own content to the page. Just be prepared for others to edit it. I do not know myself how accurate the page presently is, but it certainly matches my layman knowledge of the [[romanticism|Romantic]] view of a [[period]] alchemist. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:55, 2 Mar 2006 (CST)<br />
* Well, that answered my question as to how the articles are written. Thanks, I'll do my best to articulate what I know, as I study the subject, but am far from being a scholar of any sort.--[[User:Yevaul|Yevaul]] 18:58, 5 Mar 2006 (CST)<br />
<br />
== New Article ==<br />
<br />
Hello, fellow SCA enthusiasts!<br />
<br />
This article is presently under construction by yours truly, and will progress in stages. So, that being said, please be patient and understand that if something seems incomplete, it most probably is.<br />
<br />
Thank you!<br />
--[[User:Yevaul|Yevaul]] 13:22, 28 Apr 2006 (EST)</div>Yevaulhttps://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?title=Talk:Alchemy&diff=15854Talk:Alchemy2006-03-06T00:58:11Z<p>Yevaul: </p>
<hr />
<div>With all due respect, the author of this article is completely misinformed, and espouses to the most common misunderstandings concerning alchemy. If the author had bothered to explore the topic without any modern scientific bias (a good start would've been the link attached at the end), then this article might have more merit.<br />
--[[User:Yevaul|Yevaul]] 19:34, 2 Mar 2006 (CST)<br />
* Granted that topics like [[alchemy]] may have many interpretations as it has a basis in belief, but the page also had [http://cunnan.sca.org.au/index.php?title=Alchemy&action=history many authors]. Such is the way of the [[wiki]]. Should you wish to summarise an alternative version of what [[medieval]] or [[renaissance]] alchemy broadly was, then you are welcome to add your own content to the page. Just be prepared for others to edit it. I do not know myself how accurate the page presently is, but it certainly matches my layman knowledge of the [[romanticism|Romantic]] view of a [[period]] alchemist. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 19:55, 2 Mar 2006 (CST)<br />
* Well, that answered my question as to how the articles are written. Thanks, I'll do my best to articulate what I know, as I study the subject, but am far from being a scholar of any sort.--[[User:Yevaul|Yevaul]] 18:58, 5 Mar 2006 (CST)</div>Yevaulhttps://cunnan.lochac.sca.org/index.php?title=Talk:Alchemy&diff=14843Talk:Alchemy2006-03-03T01:34:56Z<p>Yevaul: </p>
<hr />
<div>With all due respect, the author of this article is completely misinformed, and espouses to the most common misunderstandings concerning alchemy. If the author had bothered to explore the topic without any modern scientific bias (a good start would've been the link attached at the end), then this article might have more merit.<br />
--[[User:Yevaul|Yevaul]] 19:34, 2 Mar 2006 (CST)</div>Yevaul